[OS X Emacs] aquamacs 2.0 performance

David Penton djp at arqux.com
Wed Jun 9 22:35:16 EDT 2010


On 2010-06-09, at 10:17 PM, David Penton wrote:

> 
> On 2010-05-30, at 11:55 AM, Gideon Simpson wrote:
> 
>> Am I alone in finding that, aquamacs 1.9 was a bit snappier than 2.0?  I'm not sure I can quite articulate it, but 2.0 just seems a bit slower on my 10.6 machine.
>> 
>> -gideon
>> 
>> _____________________________________________________________
>> MacOSX-Emacs mailing list
>> MacOSX-Emacs at email.esm.psu.edu
>> http://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-emacs
>> List Archives: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.macintosh.osx
> 
> That is my subjective evaluation also. Startup time is certainly worse on my Mini and Macbook (both 110.6.3).
> 

My bad - I meant to write "OS X 10.6.3".


More information about the MacOSX-Emacs mailing list