[OS X TeX] Replace LaTeX????
jjcrump at u.washington.edu
Fri Feb 11 14:25:13 EST 2005
... And what's more, I've always considered the greatest advantage of a
typesetting program is the two tiered process of editing. The first time
through _should_ look messy: that's because it _is_. WYSIWYG editors
obscure this fact by making it seem like your first draft is ready to
publish, which it _isn't_.
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Claus Gerhardt wrote:
> The tex source is not intended for reading but only for compiling. Human
> reading is only required for editing. I therefore have to admit that I don't
> understand this discussion.
Dept. of History 353560
University of Washington
Seattle, WA. 98195
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the MacOSX-TeX