<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Apr 24, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Richard Seguin wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">Also, it appears that \use{bickham} defines bickham as a \cal font. I'm already using the swash capitals as \cal in the MinionPro package and have been using the script fonts for \scr. Would I have to manually define bickham as a math \cal font? I take it that mathalpha is not set up to access the semibold version of bickham.<br></span></blockquote></div><br><div>What I should do after completing bickham-s is add a new option bickhams to mathalfa that uses semibold weight for either selection of cal or scr, with bold version still set to bickham-b.</div><div><br></div><div>Michael</div></body></html>