[OS X Emacs] Aquamacs and frames...
kuepper.jochen at googlemail.com
Tue Sep 16 14:29:52 EDT 2008
On 16.09.2008, at 11:00, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
>> C-x 5 0
> That is the emacs way :)
And that's good.
> But I was wondering what was the rationale behind "Close buffer= Cmd
> +W" in Aquamacs...
> I can understand why closing the last frame also means closing the
> existing buffers (first), but why would a Mac user use Cmd+W to
> close something that will not look closed after the command...
Isn't the default in Aquamacs "one buffer one frame" (or something
The CMD-w does what you want it. I prefer Emacs beahviour --
everything in one frame until I decide to do something else... The I
want Emacs commands. It actually never occured to me to press CMD-w in
Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de
Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité GnuPG key: CC1B0B4D
Sex, drugs and rock-n-roll
More information about the MacOSX-Emacs