[OS X Emacs] Aquamacs and frames...

Jochen Küpper kuepper.jochen at googlemail.com
Tue Sep 16 14:29:52 EDT 2008

On 16.09.2008, at 11:00, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:

>> C-x 5 0
> That is the emacs way :)

And that's good.

> But I was wondering what was the rationale behind "Close buffer= Cmd 
> +W" in Aquamacs...
> I can understand why closing the last frame also means closing the  
> existing buffers (first), but why would a Mac user use Cmd+W to  
> close something that will not look closed after the command...

Isn't the default in Aquamacs "one buffer one frame" (or something  
like that)?

The CMD-w does what you want it. I prefer Emacs beahviour --  
everything in one frame until I decide to do something else... The I  
want Emacs commands. It actually never occured to me to press CMD-w in  

Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit                http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de
     Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité                GnuPG key: CC1B0B4D
         Sex, drugs and rock-n-roll

More information about the MacOSX-Emacs mailing list