[OS X TeX] cm vs cm-super vs lmodern
Will Robertson
will at mecheng.adelaide.edu.au
Sat Jul 17 01:44:42 EDT 2004
On 17 Jul 2004, at 5:23 AM, Aditya Dushyant Trivedi wrote:
> Also is there any reason one would want to use the regular bitmapped
> cm fonts instead of cm-super?
The bitmapped CM fonts are created directly from Knuth's METAFONT
sources, and, if configured for your printer, will give the highest
quality output possible, especially when using non-standard sizes. That
said, you'd need to be a real pro to notice the difference.
(The size thing would be the most obvious ... because the CM fonts have
optical scaling, they change shape subtly as their size varies. The
scalable fonts only have a few different shapes available (from 5pt to
17pt at most) and linearly scale those to get arbitrary sizes.)
Will
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the MacOSX-TeX
mailing list