[OS X TeX] Lobbying for Reply-To as it used to be

Claus Gerhardt claus.gerhardt at urz.uni-heidelberg.de
Mon Mar 22 08:00:21 EST 2004

I support Bruno's request. Replying to the list seems to be the natural 
default behaviour. The only drawback are the auto replies, which 
however can be caught and eliminated by implementing a simple filter  
so that they don't reach the list.


On 22.03.2004, at 12:29, Bruno Voisin wrote:

> A few weeks ago the Reply-To field for this list was changed, from the 
> whole list to the original poster. This was done, I think, after 
> people complained the original behaviour violated common list 
> etiquette. In particular, because of this, it might happen that 
> replies intended for the original poster only were sent to the whole 
> list, creating discomfort and embarassment.
> I would like to lobby for a return to the original behaviour. It seems 
> to me that the default way of proceeding, when replying to a list 
> message, is to reply to the whole list, not the original poster. After 
> all, messages to a list are supposed to be in everybody's interest, 
> and similarly for the reply and ensuing thread. It is only in specific 
> circumstances that one may want to reply to the original poster only, 
> I think.
> At the time of the change I thought I would adapt easily to the new 
> behaviour and said nothing, but now after a few weeks I'm still 
> finding this new behaviour inconvenient and illogical. Often I reply 
> to one person when I think I've replied the whole list; judging by 
> some messages I receive, I guess I'm not the only one.
> Bruno Voisin
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Please see <http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/> for list
> guidelines, information, and LaTeX/TeX resources.

Please see <http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/> for list
guidelines, information, and LaTeX/TeX resources.

More information about the MacOSX-TeX mailing list