[OS X TeX] New TeX i-Package release in *EXPERIMENTAL* i-Directory
Michael S. Hanson
mshanson at wesleyan.edu
Sun Feb 27 12:52:36 EST 2005
On Feb 27, 2005, at 11:36 AM, Gerben Wierda wrote:
> I think the HOME directory is a bad idea because it is often part of a
> back up. Suddenly adding 25MB to such a back-up (compiled formats) is
> generally not popular.
>
> OTOH, the i-Packages live in ~/Documents, are far larger. But these
> can be thinned and still work.
As you point out, the current placement of files by the i-Installer
does complicate (or at least lengthen) one's back-up process. Is there
a reason why these files are not placed in, say, ~/Library/Application
Support? In addition to the practical issue above, from a
philosophical perspective I think the only things that should be in
~/Documents are things the user placed there explicitly. (Yes,
Microsoft and Adobe, I am glaring at you! At least I have figured out
how to make Stata behave....)
> It could be in ~/.texmf-config (which is close to what teTeX now has
> by default), be in the HOME directory but still separate from
> ~/Library/texmf
I'm not crazy about the proliferation of
~/.something_invisible_to_the_Finder/ directories either ('though I
understand their Un*x heritage), and would find ~/Library/something
preferable, FWIW. Again, it often is easier to just backup ~/Library
as needed than to additionally worry about tracking down "out-of-sight,
out-of-mind" directories. Just my (rapidly depreciating) $0.02.
-- Mike
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the MacOSX-TeX
mailing list