[OS X TeX] pstoedit i-Package

Claus Gerhardt gerhardt at math.uni-heidelberg.de
Tue Jan 18 14:09:02 EST 2005

I wonder why this backward compatibility to 10.2.8 is necessary. Is it 
because of some packages or because of some computers? It's hard to 
imaging that there are computers that can't run 10.3.

Wouldn't a strict 10.3 conform compilation make the packages more 


On Jan 18, 2005, at 18:02, Gerben Wierda wrote:

> A basic recompile would probably be easy for me to maintain (I have
> several of these which do not cost me any time to maintain, when I am 
> told
> a newer version is available, I download, unarchive and run a make
> reinstall on my package (that is, these days after my 10.2.8 reboot 
> which
> takes 15 minutes as it boots from a DVD with 10.2.8 + developer 8-) 
> due to
> space constraints on my new iBook.

--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
           & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>

More information about the MacOSX-TeX mailing list