[OS X TeX] xdvi and/or acrobat reader with darwin ports emacs
Adam R. Maxwell
amaxwell at mac.com
Sat Jan 22 18:46:20 EST 2005
On Jan 22, 2005, at 13:35, Peter Dyballa wrote:
> Am 22.01.2005 um 20:52 schrieb Adam R. Maxwell:
>> At some level, Quartz turns everything it displays into PDF anyway,
>> so maybe they're all PDF viewers.
> At least the X clients are pure.
What do you mean by this? As someone who has spent a lot of time
porting and using X11 applications on a variety of platforms, I think X
purely sucks :P. Anyway, X11 on OS X still uses CoreGraphics, as far
as I can tell.
> And I too think that there are graphics applications in Aqua that just
> reserve a window frame, put a canvas there, and start to draw. Tom
> Kiffe's MacDviX and MacGhostview are of this kind, all Carbon and Aqua
> Emacsen ...
Depending on how they do this, it may or may not be a good idea.
Applications can still use QuickDraw, but it is strongly deprecated in
favor of Quartz/CoreGraphics, which TeXniscope uses, and Andrew Choi
appears to be working an an XEmacs Carbon port using CG and ATSUI.
> Carbon, the compatibility API for Classic applications, might have no
> idea of PDF. This PDF display thing means that you're using a canvas
> that can be warped, stretched, shrunk, manipulated with PostScript
> operators. Some canvases resist ...
Carbon is a procedural C API for Mac OS X, not just a Classic
compatibility API. Carbon applications can use CoreGraphics as well; I
think Apple's CarbonSketch is the canonical example of this. Carbon
application developers are encouraged to migrate to Quartz2D, for good
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the MacOSX-TeX