[OS X TeX] Last TeX i-Package update and MAP file fragments

[Gerben Wierda]

On Aug 11, 2006, at 17:49, Peter Dyballa wrote:

> Hello!
>
> Yesterday I tried to get the option of having a working personal  
> configuration by re-installing TeX. During that i-Installer warned me  
> twice:
>
> !!! WARNING: While searching for the right map file for  
> `ec-public-lm.map', we have
>     found the file
>        
> /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/fonts/map/pdftex/context/ec-public- 
> lm.map
>     in the right location and we are using this
>     file. However, a map file with different content has been found in
>     the obsolete location
>        
> /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/fonts/map/dvipdfm/context/ec- 
> public-lm.map
>     Please, see which version you want to use and eventually update the
>     content of the used map file. Additionally, consider removing the
>     obsolete file.

These files do not come from the TeX update but from the ConTeXt  
updater i-Package (texmf.local). You have a TeX texmf setup based on  
the teTeX 3 texmf tree and a more recent ConTeXt in texmf.local.

It looks like ConTeXt (both stable and beta) has the item twice and it  
used to be available in ConTeXT in another location still

 From my build system:

$ find /usr/local/Build -name ec-public-lm.map
/usr/local/Build/ConTeXt/fonts/map/dvipdfm/context/ec-public-lm.map
/usr/local/Build/ConTeXt/fonts/map/pdftex/context/ec-public-lm.map
/usr/local/Build/ConTeXt-beta/fonts/map/dvipdfm/context/ec-public-lm.map
/usr/local/Build/ConTeXt-beta/fonts/map/pdftex/context/ec-public-lm.map
/usr/local/Build/teTeX.3/share/texmf.tetex/fonts/map/dvips/context/ec- 
public-lm.map

In other words:
- teTeX 3 contains an older ConTeXt with the file in  
fonts/map/dvips/context/ec-public-lm.map
- Current ConTeXt (beta and stable) have two, one for pdftex and one  
for dvipdfm.

updmap seems to have trouble working with such a setup. I am unsure,  
ths is TeX/TDS/updmap specifics, so maybe Thomas Esser can answer this  
one better.

G

>
>
> This looks like nonsense. .../pdftex/context/ec-public-lm.map has  
> entries like
>
> 	ec-lmb10 LMRoman10-Demi "enclmec ReEncodeFont" <lm-ec.enc <lmb10.pfb
> 	ec-lmbo10 LMRoman10-DemiOblique "enclmec ReEncodeFont" <lm-ec.enc  
> <lmbo10.pfb
>
> which do not seem correct for use in TeX or in LaTeX.  
> .../dvipdfm/context/ec-public-lm.map has the typycal short
>
> 	ec-lmb10 lm-ec lmb10
> 	ec-lmbo10 lm-ec lmbo10
>
> entries. The real bug is that there is another MAP file fragment,  
> .../dvips/context/ec-public-lm.map, with incorrect encoding entries  
> like these:
>
> 	cork-lmb10    LMRomanDemi10-Regular        <cork-lm.enc <lmb10.pfb
> 	cork-lmbo10   LMRomanDemi10-Italic         <cork-lm.enc <lmbo10.pfb
>
> You see the cork instead of the ec encoding? And it has twelve entries  
> less. In the end pdftex.map contains the ConTeXt entries for Latin  
> Modern.
>
> What is this "enclmec" encoding? Since when can it be used? And where  
> is documentation?
>
> --
> Greetings
>
>   Pete
>
> The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new  
> discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny..."
>                                       Isaac Asimov
>
>
> ------------------------- Info --------------------------
> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
>          & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
>
>

------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
          & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/