[OS X TeX] paths in input & include
Claus Gerhardt
gerhardt at math.uni-heidelberg.de
Sun Feb 12 20:18:38 EST 2006
TeX is a fine piece of rather sophisticated software, which shouldn't
be bloated by - in my view - unnecessary additions. For most people a
flat project hierarchy will be just what they need, e.g., it always
suited me fine.
To help Alain with his specific problems I would suggest a macro
\newcommand{\includes}[1]{\include{./FolderA/FolderB/#1}
Claus
On Feb 13, 2006, at 1:03, Alain Schremmer wrote:
> Peter Dyballa wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 12.02.2006 um 22:59 schrieb Alain Schremmer:
>>
>>> 2) I was wondering if, instead of having in the document
>>>
>>> \include{FolderA/FolderB/File1}
>>>
>>> it would be possible to have in the preamble some sort of
>>>
>>> \filespath{{./FolderA/FolderB/}}
>>>
>>> and then in the document just
>>>
>>> \include{File1}
>>
>>
>> No, this won't work. graphics.sty itself looks up the graphics
>> files to be included, as far as I understand the code.
>
> *I* don't even try to read the code.
>
>> I am still a bit flexible so *I* can adjust myself or my customs
>> to kind of inadequacies of a software -- up to some extent!
>
> I have to adjust and I do of course. The issue of course is that it
> slows me down and …
>
>> Your extension has some charm. Do you need more motivation to
>> propose it to the TeX programmers?
>
> I was afraid it might come to that. OK, here it is in as few words
> as I can manage.
>
> 1) I am trying to offer a three semesters alternative to students
> who eventually wish to learn, say, differential calculus while
> still
> in need of arithmetic as they enter two-year colleges and who, as a
> result, usually face four to six semesters with a likely overall
> passing rate of the order of at most one or two percents. By the
> way, these seem to be at least 90% women.
>
> 2) I embarked in the development of a three-part proto-text to
> present the ideas in some detail but, to quote David Hestenes,
> "Early in my career, I naively thought that if you give a good idea
> to competent mathematicians or physicists, they will work out its
> implications for themselves. I have learned since that most of them
> need the implications spelled out in utter detail."
>
> 3) As a result, while I am still writing the proto-text, I have
> started an "implementation" for part 1 and part 3 which means a
> student-readable version, exercises, homework, and multiple choice
> exams.
>
> What all this means is a huge number of tex-files as well as pdf-
> files.
>
> a) For instance, a given "lesson" is written in a file without
> preamble, called "7-EditAffineFunctions" whose project root is a
> file called "7-LessonAffineFunctions" that has the preamble and, in
> the document, just a header and a \include to call
> "7-EditAffineFunctions" so that I can have the current lesson
> printed for my students. Another advantage is that, as I work on
> "7-EditAffineFunctions" and typeset it, I get a short pdf. Of
> course, "7-LessonAffineFunctions" also has both a graphicspath for
> the many figures in "7-EditAffineFunctions"
> b) But "7-EditAffineFunctions" shares a lot of its figures with the
> more or less corresponding Chapter in the proto-text and elsewhere.
> c) To check continuity, I also have a file called "Book" which is
> just a preamble with graphicspaths and a \include for each lesson
> with or without including the ExerciseSets.
> d) All the "Edit" files are in one folder and all the "Lesson"
> files
> are in a separate folder.
> e} All the figures are in folders corresponding to the lessons that
> all sit in a FiguresFolder so that I can call them from all over
> without having to keep track of copies.
> f) And then, there are the Homework that use the exercise sets and
> the multiple-choice tests that use probsoln.sty on. QuestionFiles
> that call Exercise files so as to be able to typeset quickly what I
> am working on. Each in their folders.
> etc
>
> So, yes, a \filespath{{./FolderA/FolderB/}} would be a blessing for
> me.
>
> But of course, there remains the question of how many people, other
> than myself, are dealing with this particular kind of situation.
>
> Regards
> --schremmer
>
>
>
> ------------------------- Info --------------------------
> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
> & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
>
------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
More information about the MacOSX-TeX
mailing list