[OS X TeX] Re: MacOSX-TeX Digest #1757 - 06/09/06

Ben Tipping btipping at fas.harvard.edu
Sun Jun 18 10:07:30 EDT 2006


I will be out of my office from 8 June 2006 to 20 June 2006 inclusive.

On Jun 9, 2006, at 8:00 PM, "TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List"  
<MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu> wrote:

> MacOSX-TeX Digest #1757 - Friday, June 9, 2006
>
>   New MacTeX install package
>           by "Richard Koch" <koch at math.uoregon.edu>
>   Re: [OS X TeX] New MacTeX install package
>           by "Gary L. Gray" <gray at engr.psu.edu>
>   Re: [OS X TeX] TeXShop-2.10beta
>           by "Jon Guyer" <jguyer at his.com>
>   Re: [OS X TeX] TeXShop-2.10beta
>           by "Bob Kerstetter" <bkerstetter at mac.com>
>   Re: [OS X TeX] TeXShop-2.10beta
>           by "Bob Kerstetter" <bkerstetter at mac.com>
>   Peter Dyballa's X11 resources available: was Re: [OS X TeX] Newbie  
> questi
>           by "Jason Davies" <ucgajpd at ucl.ac.uk>
>   Re: [OS X TeX] TeXShop-2.10beta
>           by "Gary L. Gray" <gray at engr.psu.edu>
>   Re: [OS X TeX] Paper size?
>           by "Rick Hogg" <eulipion2 at yahoo.com>
>   Re: [OS X TeX] suppress TOC
>           by "Philipp Mathey" <pmathey at uwo.ca>
>   Re: [OS X TeX] suppress TOC
>           by "Charilaos Skiadas" <cskiadas at iwu.edu>
>   Re: [OS X TeX] suppress TOC
>           by "Jon Guyer" <jguyer at his.com>
>   TeXniscope and CMR super problem
>           by "Alain Matthes" <alain.matthes at mac.com>
>   Re: [OS X TeX] suppress TOC
>           by "Philipp Mathey" <pmathey at uwo.ca>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: New MacTeX install package
> From: "Richard Koch" <koch at math.uoregon.edu>
> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 17:18:05 -0700
>
> Folks,
>
> I've put a new MacTeX.pkg install package on TUG and CTAN. This package
> won't affect you if you have obtained the many recent TeX-and-friends
> updates
> using i-Installer.
>
> The package contains Gerben Wierda's latest i-Installer, BibDesk
> 1.2.6, the latest TeX
> distribution including LaTeX updater and the ConTeXt update package
> released today,
> and Jonathan Kew's latest XeTeX. It has TeXShop 2.09d rather than the
> still beta 2.10.
>
> The package is at www.tug.org/~koch and will gradually migrate to the
> ctan mirror sites as they update themselves.
>
> Dick
> koch at math.uoregon.edu
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] New MacTeX install package
> From: "Gary L. Gray" <gray at engr.psu.edu>
> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 20:23:02 -0400
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Richard Koch wrote:
>
>> I've put a new MacTeX.pkg install package on TUG and CTAN. This
>> package
>> won't affect you if you have obtained the many recent TeX-and-
>> friends updates
>> using i-Installer.
>>
>> The package contains Gerben Wierda's latest i-Installer, BibDesk
>> 1.2.6, the latest TeX
>> distribution including LaTeX updater and the ConTeXt update package
>> released today,
>> and Jonathan Kew's latest XeTeX. It has TeXShop 2.09d rather than the
>> still beta 2.10.
>>
>> The package is at www.tug.org/~koch and will gradually migrate to the
>> ctan mirror sites as they update themselves.
>
> Dick,
>
> What has changed in 2.09d from 2.09c? I have gone back to 2.09 since
> 2.10 was given me too much heartburn (bug reports have been filed).
>
> -- Gary
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] TeXShop-2.10beta
> From: "Jon Guyer" <jguyer at his.com>
> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 20:59:58 -0400
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2006, at 3:23 PM, William Adams wrote:
>
>> I got a crash just a bit ago, and reflexively clicked to send to
>> Apple before wondering if Richard &.al. would get it
>
> They won't. I don't know for sure what Apple does with those crash
> logs, but they don't forward them to 3rd-party developers.
>
>> --- should I
>> copy it out and send it somewhere?
>
> I can't speak for Richard, but we Alpha Cabalistas always appreciate
> getting crash logs.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] TeXShop-2.10beta
> From: "Bob Kerstetter" <bkerstetter at mac.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 06:59:39 -0500
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2006, at 7:59 PM, Jon Guyer wrote:
>
>> On Jun 8, 2006, at 3:23 PM, William Adams wrote:
>>
>>> I got a crash just a bit ago, and reflexively clicked to send to
>>> Apple before wondering if Richard &.al. would get it
>>
>> They won't. I don't know for sure what Apple does with those crash
>> logs, but they don't forward them to 3rd-party developers.
>>
>>> --- should I
>>> copy it out and send it somewhere?
>
> Hi,
>
> Maybe copy the report and send it to Dick Koch. His email address is
> in the thread
>
> "New MacTeX install package"
>
> from June 8, 2006
>
> BK
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] TeXShop-2.10beta
> From: "Bob Kerstetter" <bkerstetter at mac.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 07:03:41 -0500
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2006, at 7:59 PM, Jon Guyer wrote:
>
>>> I got a crash just a bit ago, and reflexively clicked to send to
>>> Apple before wondering if Richard &.al. would get it
>>
>> They won't. I don't know for sure what Apple does with those crash
>> logs, but they don't forward them to 3rd-party developers.
>>
>>> --- should I
>>> copy it out and send it somewhere?
>
>
> Ahhhh! From the TeXShop beta page:
>
> Please make bug reports using the SourceForge bug tracking system.
> To report a bug, go to the TeXShop project on SourceForge: http://
> sourceforge.net/projects/texshop.
>
> Please ignore the earlier post, just before this one.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Peter Dyballa's X11 resources available: was Re: [OS X TeX]  
> Newbie questions:
> From: "Jason Davies" <ucgajpd at ucl.ac.uk>
> Date: Fri,  9 Jun 2006 13:42:53 +0100
>
>>> Do you think something could be arranged with Gary Gray or Joe  
>>> Slater,
>>> so that your setup is available online from the Mac OS X TeX web site
>>> < http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/>, for others to experiment with it?
>>>
>>> I'm not a X11 fan myself, but there's no reason why interested people
>>> should not be able to use the outcome of your hard work, and file
>>> reports, suggestions, etc.
>
>
> The aforementioned set of files can now be downloaded at  
> <http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucgajpd/Academic/TeX/X11%20and%20MacTeX/ 
> MacTeXandX11collected.zip>. We are in the process of sorting out a  
> readme on the download page, but for those who wanted it, there it is.
>
> Please don't ask me about it, I know next to nothing about it! There  
> is a readme in the zip archive.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] TeXShop-2.10beta
> From: "Gary L. Gray" <gray at engr.psu.edu>
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:36:53 -0400
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2006, at 8:03 AM, Bob Kerstetter wrote:
>
>> On Jun 8, 2006, at 7:59 PM, Jon Guyer wrote:
>>
>>>> I got a crash just a bit ago, and reflexively clicked to send to
>>>> Apple before wondering if Richard &.al. would get it
>>>
>>> They won't. I don't know for sure what Apple does with those crash
>>> logs, but they don't forward them to 3rd-party developers.
>>>
>>>> --- should I
>>>> copy it out and send it somewhere?
>>
>>
>> Ahhhh! From the TeXShop beta page:
>>
>> Please make bug reports using the SourceForge bug tracking system.
>> To report a bug, go to the TeXShop project on SourceForge: http://
>> sourceforge.net/projects/texshop.
>>
>> Please ignore the earlier post, just before this one.
>
> Hmmmmm. Exactly what I sent to the list yesterday afternoon.
>
> -- Gary
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Paper size?
> From: "Rick Hogg" <eulipion2 at yahoo.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
>
> The problem was when I typed \documentclass[a4paper
> (or b5 or legal or anything else)]{article} or
> whatever other format I chose, LaTeX would produce
> letter-sized documents.  While the vast majority of
> papers I write will be in letter format, I like to
> have the option available to change paper sizes.  The
> geometry package works wonderfully!
>
> Rick
>
> --- Samuel Lelievre <samuel.lelievre at univ-rennes1.fr>
> wrote:
>
>> Isn't the solution just using the "a4paper" option
>> rather
>> than the "a4" option?
>>
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Quick question about paper size.  It seems that
>>> whether I set it to letter, legal, a4, b5, etc.,
>> while
>>> the text shifts a little, the paper size doesn't
>> seem
>>> to change at all.  I have the same results using
>>> TeXShop and the latex command in the command line.
>> Is
>>> it just me, or is my ps or pdf maker not
>> recognizing
>>> page sizes?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Rick
>>
>> ------------------------- Info
>> --------------------------
>> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
>>           & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
>> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
>> List Archive:
>> http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] suppress TOC
> From: "Philipp Mathey" <pmathey at uwo.ca>
> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:11:41 -0400
>
> Thanks,
>
> but I don't have a \tableofcontents in the preamble that I could
> comment out.
> The TOC I am talking about seems to be automatically created
> when using the hyperref package.
> I noticed that adding the option 'draft' to the documentclass
> line causes the TOC to disappear, but it also causes
> hyperlinks not to work anymore.
>
> So the question is whether there is a way to use
> the hyperref package such that
> (1) the hyperlinks work, but
> (2) there is no table of contents attached to the document.
>
>
> On 8-Jun-06, at 5:58 PM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 08.06.2006 um 21:17 schrieb Philipp Mathey:
>>
>>> Is there a way to suppress the TOC ? I.e. I would like to use
>>> the hyperref package but I don't want the TOC.
>>
>> I use
>>
>> 	%\tableofcontents
>>
>> The real TOC is hand-made and uses hyperref references to jump
>> directly to the article ...
>>
>> --
>> Greetings
>>
>>   Pete
>>
>> When people run around and around in circles we say they are crazy.
>> When planets do it we say they are orbiting.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------- Info --------------------------
>> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
>>          & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
>> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
>> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
>>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] suppress TOC
> From: "Charilaos Skiadas" <cskiadas at iwu.edu>
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:38:35 -0500
>
> On Jun 9, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Philipp Mathey wrote:
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> but I don't have a \tableofcontents in the preamble that I could
>> comment out.
>> The TOC I am talking about seems to be automatically created
>> when using the hyperref package.
>> I noticed that adding the option 'draft' to the documentclass
>> line causes the TOC to disappear, but it also causes
>> hyperlinks not to work anymore.
>
> Let me make sure I understand this right. If you remove the hyperref
> package and do NOT have draft as an option, there is no table of
> contents created?
> And then just including the hyperref package generates the table?
> I don't see why the hyperref package would automatically create a
> TOC, and I just tried in a tiny article to just include the hyperref
> package, and there was no TOC created. My guess is that there is some
> other reason why the TOC is created. Perhaps providing a small test
> case demonstrating the problem would help.
>
>> So the question is whether there is a way to use
>> the hyperref package such that
>> (1) the hyperlinks work, but
>> (2) there is no table of contents attached to the document.
>>
>
> Haris
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] suppress TOC
> From: "Jon Guyer" <jguyer at his.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 14:01:15 -0400
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2006, at 1:11 PM, Philipp Mathey wrote:
>
>> but I don't have a \tableofcontents in the preamble that I could
>> comment out.
>> The TOC I am talking about seems to be automatically created
>> when using the hyperref package.
>> I noticed that adding the option 'draft' to the documentclass
>> line causes the TOC to disappear, but it also causes
>> hyperlinks not to work anymore.
>>
>> So the question is whether there is a way to use
>> the hyperref package such that
>> (1) the hyperlinks work, but
>> (2) there is no table of contents attached to the document.
>
> You might try passing either 'bookmarks=false' or
> 'bookmarksopen=false' to the hyperref package.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: TeXniscope and CMR super problem
> From: "Alain Matthes" <alain.matthes at mac.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:45:43 +0200
>
> hello:)
>
> I've made a .pdf file with pdflatex and with the CMR super.
>
> The result is fine with Texshop and Acrobat reader but it's
>   very bad with TeXniscope.
>
> No problem with the same file but with  lmodern or utopia, do you an
> idea of the problem ?
>
> With acrobat, properties of the document :
>
> CMMI10 CMMI8 CMR10 CMR8 type 1 encodage : personnalisée (utf8)
>
> Alain Matthes
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] suppress TOC
> From: "Philipp Mathey" <pmathey at uwo.ca>
> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:53:33 -0400
>
>
>
> Charilaos :
>
> I never tried removing the hyperref package because I want to use it.
> I did some experimenting and found that indeed removing  or adding
> the hyperref package does not matter, at least not while
> compiling with xelatex. No TOC is added. So you were right
> and I was wrong.
>
> So where did the TOC come form that I saw ? I think it has
> something to do with whizzytex (that's what I am using).
> Probably whizzytex adds a TOC at some point.
>
> On 9-Jun-06, at 2:01 PM, Jon Guyer wrote:
>>
>> You might try passing either 'bookmarks=false' or
>> 'bookmarksopen=false' to the hyperref package.
>>
>
> That works. Thanks, Jon !
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> End of MacOSX-TeX Digest
>
> ------------------------- Info --------------------------
> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
>           & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
          & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/




More information about the MacOSX-TeX mailing list