[OS X TeX] OT: looking for a public-domain EPS file editor
siepo at cybercomm.nl
Wed Apr 25 16:14:25 EDT 2007
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 07:12:16PM +0200, Bruno Voisin wrote:
> Le 25 avr. 07 Ã 15:22, Bruno Voisin a Ã©crit :
> >That's all! You can just double-click epspdf.app in the Finder, and
> >you'll be presented with a nice and no-nonsense GUI. The option to
> >remove unnecessary invisible objects corresponds to the checkbox
> >"Compute tight boundingbox".
> Actually, getting now hold of the original Tecplot file instead of
> the test file I had created, the script epspdf appears not to work on
> that particular file. It seems the file is so deeply wrong that only
> Illustrator can make it right.
> To be more specific, I've posted temporarily the 3 files at <http://
> - bulle-orig.eps: the original Tecplot file
> - bulle-epspdf.eps: the result of asking for a tight bounding box in
> - bulle-ai.eps: the result of ungrouping the elements in Illustrator
> then suppressing the unwanted "frame"
Earlier, I was wrong and you were right about eps -> pdf -> eps.
epspdf limits itself to just fixing the boundingbox if it can. Maybe
I should add a button to convert via pdf anyway, since this can
eliminate a lot of oddities.
Withr gv under Linux, the boundingbox of bulle-epspdf looks ok.
With a text editor, I find:
bulle-orig 300 10 450 760
bulle-epspdf 315 28 443 725
bulle-ai 0 0 126 698 (and 12 times the file size)
With Preview under osx, only the bulle-ai boundingbox is displayed
correctly. One explanation I can think of is that Preview uses the
page definition in the eps, or otherwise a default page size,
instead of the boundingbox. How does it look if you use the result
in a TeX document?
------------------------- Helpful Info -------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
List Reminders & Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/
More information about the MacOSX-TeX