[OS X TeX] Remarks about TeX on Leopard
Bruno Voisin
bvoisin at mac.com
Sun Nov 4 08:16:44 EST 2007
Le 4 nov. 07 à 13:30, Peter Dyballa a écrit :
> This is not needed in my opinion. And it's a bad substitution: echo
> is built-in to bash and other shells (man builtin) while printf is
> an external programme.
From the man page of echo:
The following option is available:
-n Do not print the trailing newline character. This may
also be
achieved by appending `\c' to the end of the string, as is
done by
iBCS2 compatible systems. Note that this option as well
as the
effect of `\c' are implementation-defined in IEEE Std
1003.1-2001
(``POSIX.1'') as amended by Cor. 1-2002. Applications
aiming for
maximum portability are strongly encouraged to use
printf(1) to
suppress the newline character.
Some shells may provide a builtin echo command which is similar
or iden-
tical to this utility. Most notably, the builtin echo in sh(1)
does not
accept the -n option. Consult the builtin(1) manual page.
Bruno Voisin
------------------------- Helpful Info -------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
List Reminders & Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/
More information about the MacOSX-TeX
mailing list