[OS X TeX] Leopard 10.5.1

[Josep M. Font]

El 16/11/2007, a las 10:40, Bruno Voisin escribió:

> Relative to TeX I don't know yet, but after applying the update and  
> then using Disk Utility to verify permissions for my hard drive,  
> I'm now getting:
>
> Warning: SUID file "usr/libexec/load_hdi" has been modified and  
> will not be repaired.
> Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/ 
> DiskManagement.framework/Versions/A/Resources/DiskManagementTool"  
> has been modified and will not be repaired.
> Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/ 
> DesktopServicesPriv.framework/Versions/A/Resources/Locum" has been  
> modified and will not be repaired.
> Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/ 
> Install.framework/Versions/A/Resources/runner" has been modified  
> and will not be repaired.
> Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/ 
> Admin.framework/Versions/A/Resources/readconfig" has been modified  
> and will not be repaired.
> Warning: SUID file "System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/ 
> Admin.framework/Versions/A/Resources/writeconfig" has been modified  
> and will not be repaired.
> Warning: SUID file "usr/libexec/authopen" has been modified and  
> will not be repaired.
> Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/Finder.app/Contents/ 
> Resources/OwnerGroupTool" has been modified and will not be repaired.
> Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ 
> ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/ARDAgent" has been modified and will  
> not be repaired.
>
> The last warning was already there (I suppose it appeared after  
> applying the Remote Desktop Client update just after installing  
> Leopard), but all the others are new.
>
> My interpretation is that these warnings just signal core files  
> which have been modified by the 10.5.1 update. If not, then that's  
> really scary and would indicate an OS whose core inner organs have  
> been modified inadvertently; if that's indeed the case, then I  
> imagine a new Archive & Install of Leopard would be required,  
> though I'm really not willing to go along that route again if I can  
> avoid it.

In one of Apple's forums they reported that if you download the  
updater direclty from the downloads page and apply it locally (as  
opposed to running Software Update) then only the last message appears.

JMaF