[OS X TeX] Input encoding question
Axel E. Retif
axel.retif at mac.com
Fri Feb 20 03:06:44 EST 2009
On 20 Feb, 2009, at 01:49, Peter Dyballa wrote:
> Am 20.02.2009 um 08:07 schrieb Axel E. Retif:
>> My point in favor of a utf-8 default is, 1) most of (La)TeX and
>> ConTeXt users around the world need more than 127 characters, and
>> we are already accustomed to input them directly with either
>> latin1, latin9 or utf-8; and 2) most of recent TeX editors (v.gr.,
>> TeXmaker, TeXworks) have already utf-8 as default.
> Just because *some* software can handle it, it's not reason enough.
> Files grow big because some (statistically: quite all) characters
> are represented by more than one byte, software needs to extra-
> process these byte sequences.
OK. Good point.
>> [...] for sure LaTeX will understand applemac, but the thing is,
>> will future TeX editors understand it?
> Yes. Because the file that describes this LaTeX encoding is part of
> a TeX distribution. An editor that does not support a LaTeX encoding
> is no "TeX editor."
With this I'm not so sure. Of course in principle you're right, but I
don't know if future Linux or Windows TeX editors will care much about
including Mac Roman as the encodings they understand.
More information about the MacOSX-TeX