[OS X TeX] Is there a better alternative to \DeclareGraphicsExtensions ?
Ramón Figueroa-Centeno
ramonf at hawaii.edu
Tue Mar 24 23:15:41 EDT 2009
Aloha,
Your question
I mean which should be preferred way of including graphics?
has no simple answer.
If you have a vector graphic that is usually better than a bitmap (say .jpg or .png).
LaTeX takes .eps as it preferred format, whereas PDFLaTeX prefers .pdf (it handles .png,.pdf,.jpg,.mps,.jpeg,.jbig2,.jb2,.PNG,.PDF,.JPG,.JPEG,.JBIG2 and .JB2, natively).
The epstopdf and epspdfconversion packages allow to convert eps to pdf on the fly. So you can use eps with PDFLaTeX.
Ramón
--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Is-there-a-better-alternative-to-%5CDeclareGraphicsExtensions---tp2483186p2530494.html
Sent from the MacOSX-TeX mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the MacOSX-TeX
mailing list