[OS X TeX] dvips problem
lycee.condorcet at voila.fr
lycee.condorcet at voila.fr
Sun Nov 7 01:05:44 EST 2010
Thanks Peter to help me,
.
No there is no problem with dvips :
.
Fanch at elessar:/tmp$ dvips -o essai.ps essai.dvi
This is dvips(k) 5.99 Copyright 2010 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2010.11.07:0303' -> essai.ps
</usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf/dvips/base/tex.pro>
</usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf/dvips/base/texps.pro>
</usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf/dvips/base/special.pro>.
</usr/local/texlive/2010/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr10.pfb>
[1<efforts-rubadh.eps.gz>
<efforts-rubadh.eps.gz>
<efforts-rubadh.eps.gz>]
.
Dvi file seems to be ok. The 3 graphics appear whith xdvi and in the pdf file if I use dvipdf.
.
I really think that is a problem with the 2010 version of dvips. I'll have no such problem with my old 2008 version.
.
I've found in a backup, the /usr/local/texlive/2008 directory. But I don't know, how to use it to test the old dvips. The Tex system prefPane doesn't "see" this directory.
.
I've looked the .ps file with both : gs and XEmacs
.
Fanch at elessar:/tmp$ disdvi essai.dvi
000000: PRE version : 2
000002: numerator : 25400000
000006: denominator : 473628672
000010: magnification : 1000
000014: job name ( 27) : TeX output 2010.11.07:0303
000042: BOP page number : 1
000047: 0 0 0
000059: 0 0 0
000071: 0 0 0
000083: prev page offset : -00001
000087: DOWN4: 41484288
000092: PUSH
000093: DOWN4: -39649280
000098: DOWN4: 37683200
000103: PUSH
000104: DOWN4: -22868087
000109: PUSH
000110: PUSH
000111: RIGHT3: 5046272
000115: XXX1: 119 bytes
000117: PSfile="efforts-rubadh.eps.gz" llx=0 lly=0 urx=842 ury=595 rwi=2834
000236: POP
000237: PUSH
000238: RIGHT4: 23838705
000243: XXX1: 119 bytes
000245: PSfile="efforts-rubadh.eps.gz" llx=0 lly=0 urx=842 ury=595 rwi=2834
000364: POP
000365: POP
000366: DOWN4: 13242249
000371: PUSH
000372: PUSH
000373: RIGHT3: 4063232
000377: XXX1: 119 bytes
000379: PSfile="efforts-rubadh.eps.gz" llx=0 lly=0 urx=842 ury=595 rwi=2834
000498: POP
000499: POP
000500: POP
000501: DOWN3: 1966080
000505: PUSH
000506: RIGHT4: 15204352
000511: FNT_DEF1: 7
000513: checksum : 1274110073
000517: scale : 655360
000521: design : 655360
000525: name : cmr10
000532: FONT_07 /* cmr10 */
000533: Char: 1
000534: POP
000535: POP
000536: EOP
000537: POST last page offset : 000042
000542: numerator : 25400000
000546: denominator : 473628672
000550: magnification : 1000
000554: max page height : 41484288
000558: max page width : 26673152
000562: stack size needed: 4
000564: number of pages : 1
000566: FNT_DEF1: 7
000568: checksum : 1274110073
000572: scale : 655360
000576: design : 655360
000580: name : cmr10
000587: POSTPOST postamble offset : 000537
000592: version : 2
000593: TRAILER
000594: TRAILER
000595: TRAILER
000596: TRAILER
000597: TRAILER
000598: TRAILER
000599: TRAILER
.
> > I use the command line (and Xemacs)
>
> I used the command line in GNU Emacs and also AUCTeX (which was using
> TeX Live 2009 because of environment). The versions you report are
> what I see as well.
>
> My commands were:
>
> latex file
> dvips file -o file.ps
>
> the latter a bit unorthodox, I think, dvips would have preferred '-o
> file.ps file'... Here it's OK.
>
> Do you see latex complain about missing bounding box dimensions,
> possibly stopping? And I still don't know how you create the PS file
> from the LaTeX source...
>
> BTW, you can look with XEmacs into the DVI file. The utilities disdvi
> and dvitype can also give you clues about the DVI file. Do you check
> the PS file with a particular viewer or do you just read PostScript?
____________________________________________________
Nouveau : le catalogue officiel des paroles de vos chansons préférées sont sur : http://paroles.voila.fr
More information about the MacOSX-TeX
mailing list