[OS X TeX] Using STIX for a single font

[Herbert Schulz]

> On Jun 14, 2015, at 12:47 PM, David Derbes <loki at uchicago.edu> wrote:
> 
> Exactly right, Herb. I thought I had commented it out. Nope, I deleted it (after the suggested addition of \boondox failed to compile; too many alphabets) and then retyped it incorrectly. 
> 
> Everything Michael told me to do worked. I managed somehow to completely screw things up not once but twice. I am now back to where I was, except that I have a solution to the original query thanks to Michael. 
> 
> He’s written me off-line to see if he can figure out how to get me a lower case script p in math mode that won’t clobber the other \mathscr glyphs I would like to keep. STIX has near-copies of \mathscr{L} and \mathscr{H}, but I don’t like ‘em as well as what I get from the \mathrsfs package. I feel very guilty for having him spend any more time on this, and for perhaps leaving the impression that advice he’d given me caused me trouble. His advice was fine. My attempting to follow his advice was entirely loused up.
> 
> I can always use \wp. Not ideal, but it works.
> 
> Thanks once again to everyone, and apologies for my many stupidities.
> 
> David Derbes
> 
> On Jun 14, 2015, at 12:01, Herbert Schulz <herbs at wideopenwest.com> wrote:
> 
>>> On Jun 14, 2015, at 11:18 AM, David Derbes <loki at uchicago.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I had to comment out \usepackage{mathrfsr} to get the document to compile. So I uncommented that. And now, LaTeX cannot find mathrfsr.sty.
>>> 
>> 
>> Howdy,
>> 
>> The mathrfsr package doesn't exist in Tex Live or even CTAN so I think you may have a spelling error in there.
>> 
>> Good Luck,
>> 
>> Herb Schulz
>> (herbs at wideopenwest dot com)

Howdy,

If I would relate the many times I screwed up ...

Good Luck,

Herb Schulz
(herbs at wideopenwest dot com)