[OS X Emacs] aquamacs 2.0 performance
djp at arqux.com
Wed Jun 9 22:17:01 EDT 2010
On 2010-05-30, at 11:55 AM, Gideon Simpson wrote:
> Am I alone in finding that, aquamacs 1.9 was a bit snappier than 2.0? I'm not sure I can quite articulate it, but 2.0 just seems a bit slower on my 10.6 machine.
> MacOSX-Emacs mailing list
> MacOSX-Emacs at email.esm.psu.edu
> List Archives: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.macintosh.osx
That is my subjective evaluation also. Startup time is certainly worse on my Mini and Macbook (both 110.6.3).
- Dave -
More information about the MacOSX-Emacs