typesetting script calls and iTeXMac and wrappers (was Re: [OS X TeX] Page size? (Using TeXShop and XeTeX and plain))
William F. Adams
wadams at atlis.com
Sat Apr 17 09:21:44 EDT 2004
On Saturday, April 17, 2004, at 03:40 AM, Jérôme Laurens wrote:
> better idea: give the whole shell script command needed to typeset the
> document in the first line, not just parameters.
> even better idea: also give the whole shell script command to make the
> bibliography, in case we need something better than bibtex
> even better idea: also give the command to make the index, in case we
> need something better than makeindex
> All this overriding the usual behaviour when present.
> This is so better than the actual TeXShop UI and exactly what iTeXMac
> implemented a long time ago.
I regret that I'm not more familiar w/ iTeXMac --- unfortunately, I
found it to be somewhat overwhelming when I first tried it out. My
mindset doesn't wrap around the UI properly or something, but it does
work well for a lot of people, and I do try to remember to suggest it
when I mention TeXshop and I do need to look into it again.
Perhaps there could be a ``simple UI mode'' for iTeXMac where it'd
mimic TeXshop and one could turn on features as one needs them?
> But in fact, this is not such a good idea: adding meaningful TeX
> comments to a document should be considered as a pollution and should
> be avoided for portability reasons.
> The right answer to that problem is in the forthcoming TeX Wrapper
Agreed. I was quite disappointed that things didn't work out better w/
the Wrapper bit.
<snip> the last bit which I think was unintentionally pejorative 'cause
of the language barrier.
William Adams, publishing specialist
voice - 717-731-6707 | Fax - 717-731-6708
Please see <http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/> for list
guidelines, information, and LaTeX/TeX resources.
More information about the MacOSX-TeX