[OS X TeX] Ghostscript 8.50 i-Package
gurari at cse.ohio-state.edu
Tue Dec 21 14:39:35 EST 2004
> <grin> I'm investigating the use of tex4ht to translate small snippets
> of latex math-code into mathml. This is some background research for
> future versions of the Equation service or similar applications
> both the latex and mathml encoded versions of the same math-code to the
> made easy with pdftk). I'm still wondering whether I should go for the
> "pure" mathml or for a browser friendly version. The idea is that for
> OmniOutliner can extract either the mathml or the latex version of the
> for export into other formats.
If the mathml code is to be farther filtered and one has full control
over the filter, I would go for the xhmlatex mode. Otherwise, I think
the mzlatex mode is safer.
One of the main differences between the two modes is in how `rare'
unicode symbols are supported. For instance, the xhmlatex mode
provides a single unicode symbol ﬀ for the ligature ffl;
mzlatex currently provides a triplet of characters for the ligature.
Once the ligature will be widely supported by browsers, mzlatex is
expected to change its behavior accordingly.
--------------------- Info ---------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Post: <mailto:MacOSX-TeX at email.esm.psu.edu>
More information about the MacOSX-TeX