[OS X TeX] boxing equations
Gary L. Gray
gray at engr.psu.edu
Mon Apr 3 15:11:22 EDT 2006
You all should really be looking at the empheq package.
On Apr 3, 2006, at 2:26 PM, KL Tah wrote:
> has anyone tried boxing equation, displaymath, eqnarray etc.? so
> that just the equations (not the equation number) are boxed? How
> about boxing equation numbers too?If I remember correctly, have
> done this a long time ago but the result was that it shrinks the
> equation being boxed so I stopped using it.
>
> KL
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Themis Matsoukas wrote:
>
>> On Apr 3, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Arthur Snoke wrote:
>>> I want to box equations that are written using $$ ...$$.
>>>
>>> \fbox does not work.
>>
>> I should have said \fbox{$\displaystyle...$} instead of \fbox
>> {...}, otherwise \fbox assumes text. Maybe that's the problem?
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2006, at 12:52 PM, Franck Pastor wrote:
>>
>>> but \boxed looks better (in my opinion), and it is part of the
>>> amsmath package :-)
>>
>> I haven't used \boxed, though now that I know about it I'll try
>> it. I've been using a custom version of \fbox with some struts to
>> increase the size of the box.
>>
>> Themis
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------- Info --------------------------
>> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
>> & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
>> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
>> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
>>
>
>
> ------------------------- Info --------------------------
> Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
> & FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
>
------------------------- Info --------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
& FAQ: http://latex.yauh.de/faq/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
More information about the MacOSX-TeX
mailing list