[OS X TeX] Papers or BibDesk?
rloukano at stp.lingfil.uu.se
Mon Apr 30 09:01:19 EDT 2007
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Bruno Voisin wrote:
> Le 29 avr. 07 Ã 21:18, Oliver Buerschaper a Ã©crit :
>> On the other hand BibDesk is rather stable and for my purposes it does a
>> good job keeping all my references together. However, I miss a few things
>> like being able to group papers into subcategories of first level groups.
>> But still BibDesk has been my number one choice for quite some time (and
>> will probably remain so for a little while ;-)
> Do you mean it's possible with BibDesk to group papers based on various types
> of metadata, and then to filter out and sort them and prepare lists of the
> output? That's the kind of things I did more than a decade ago with FileMaker
> Pro (not for papers, it was for organizing a conference), but I'm wondering
> whether BibDesk could do this.
> To be more specific: below are examples of lists I do currently through
> tedious cut-and-paste, which is clearly sub-efficient:
I've tried to take a look, but it seems you took away the access.
> That's the kind of functionality I'm interested in for BibDesk at the moment,
All this sounds as what I need too. Unfortunately, I would not have time
in the coming 1-2 months, but it seems I have to try BibDesk, may be
following your steps.
------------------------- Helpful Info -------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
List Reminders & Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/
More information about the MacOSX-TeX