[OS X TeX] Creating a Sensible PDF Document
pmathey at uwo.ca
Wed Feb 7 12:23:55 EST 2007
I am also interested in the same question (or at least a part of it) :
If I wanted to create a document with say xelatex that
can be read on some machine not running mac os x . say a system
running Linux with xpdf,
would I have to choose the option to have all fonts embedded in the
during the configuration phase even though this will create a much
document ? Is that the only way ?
> Note that as document length increases, the benefit of using the
> standard fonts and avoiding any font embedding becomes negligible
> compared to the overall size of the document (and other aspects of
> the space-efficiency of the PDF code generated).
I don't fully understand that sentence. So you are saying that one
should embed fonts ? Could you elaborate ?
> I just compared the results of latex+dvips+ps2pdf14 versus xelatex
> +xdvipdfmx (see below) and found that while a short (3-page)
> document generated a smaller PDF using your option (1), duplicating
> the text a number of times to make a 23-page version resulted in a
> much smaller PDF with (3b).
> Then there's choice 3b: xelatex can be run (on Mac OS X) with
> either the default xdv2pdf output driver, or with xdvipdfmx (the
> portable driver also used on Linux/Windows/etc). The results can be
> dramatically different: in many cases, xdvipdfmx generates
> significantly more compact PDF. To do this, you call xelatex with
> the -output-driver option, e.g:
While I have not noticed any differences in the appearance between
xelatex documents compiled with xdvipdfmx instead of xdv2pdf,
I did notice that xdvipdfmx is significantly faster than xdv2pdf.
------------------------- Helpful Info -------------------------
Mac-TeX Website: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
List Reminders & Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/
More information about the MacOSX-TeX