[OS X TeX] command-click on the name of a console file

Nicolae Garleanu garleanu at haas.berkeley.edu
Fri Nov 16 02:10:15 EST 2012


I still favor the freedom of choice.
Nicolae

From: Ross Moore <ross.moore at mq.edu.au<mailto:ross.moore at mq.edu.au>>
Reply-To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu<mailto:macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>>
Date: Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:29 PM
To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu<mailto:macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>>
Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] command-click on the name of a console file


On 16/11/2012, at 8:19 AM, Herbert Schulz wrote:

>
> On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Nicolae Garleanu <garleanu at haas.berkeley.edu<mailto:garleanu at haas.berkeley.edu>> wrote:
>
>> It means that you don't have to close windows all the time -- they disappear as soon as the problem is solved, or simply the compiler is told to skip it. I know how to close an extra window, I just wished I didn't have to. I am also sure it is technically feasible, thus could be part of a future release: when compilation reaches end, close window automatically.
>>
>> A bit like my earlier post about being able to double-click in the source to search the pdf and vice-versa, rather than Cmd-click -- in principle feasible, nice to have (for some people, at least) although not a sine-qua-non.
>>
>> Nicolae

> Howdy,
>
> I guess I like having the console window hanging around (by the way, I have the console window always come to the font when I compile---it drops behind the Preview when compilation is complete) since I can then trace everything that has happened (even if it's a line that doesn't break nicely) quickly.

Exactly.
There are many things that do not count as an error to interrupt
compilation, but nevertheless look bad in the final PDF output.

The Console/Log is your friend here.

e.g.
 Underfull and Overfull boxes,
 whether all your citations, cross-references etc. have been
  fully resolved,
 Other types of warning
 Font substitutions
 messages that you can write to yourself
 versions of packages
 tracing problematic coding, or just to see how it works
 etc.
 etc.


It just takes some time and experience to understand everything
that it is telling you about your last LaTeX run.

Unless you look at the Console, or examine every page
of your final PDF, there can easily be imperfections that
you just do not know about.


In short, people should learn to use the Console more, not less.

>
> I admit that my work habit is to only be working on and compiling one root source file at a time although I may have other source files open at the same time being used for reference, etc.
>
> Good Luck,
>
> Herb Schulz


Hope this helps,

        Ross

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ross Moore                                       ross.moore at mq.edu.au<mailto:ross.moore at mq.edu.au>
Mathematics Department                           office: E7A-419
Macquarie University                             tel: +61 (0)2 9850 8955
Sydney, Australia  2109                          fax: +61 (0)2 9850 8114
------------------------------------------------------------------------




----------- Please Consult the Following Before Posting -----------
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Reminders and Etiquette: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
TeX on Mac OS X Website: http://mactex-wiki.tug.org/
List Info: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://email.esm.psu.edu/pipermail/macosx-tex/attachments/20121115/47e10628/attachment.html>


More information about the MacOSX-TeX mailing list